DEBATE about the value of prescribed burning has followed a study published by Australia National University and Curtin University which called the practice “grounded in simplistic models”; Forestry Australia disputed the claims, saying cool burning was “based on decades of on-ground research and lived experience”. Photo: SUPPLIED.
Lloyd Ilett
FORESTRY Australia (FA) has criticised a recent report released by Australia National University (ANU) and Curtin University (CU) that claimed logging and prescribed burning of forests can make them more flammable.
Hamilton Kangaroos are on the board after nine rounds of the Hampden Football Netball League (HFNL) open netball competition, with a thrilling one-goal win...